Comoros vs Eswatini: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Comoros
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 77.76 t against 49.33 t in Comoros, a difference of 28.43 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 162nd and Eswatini ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 63.38 t | 43.41 t | 19.97 t | Comoros |
| 1970s | 63.38 t | 39.47 t | 23.91 t | Comoros |
| 1980s | 63.38 t | 58.8 t | 4.58 t | Comoros |
| 1990s | 63.38 t | 65.43 t | 2.05 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 63.38 t | 33.85 t | 29.54 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 63.75 t | 70.31 t | 6.56 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 47.15 t | 80.84 t | 33.69 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Comoros or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 77.76 t against 49.33 t in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Comoros and Eswatini?
- 28.43 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Eswatini rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Comoros ranks 162nd and Eswatini ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).