Congo vs Panama: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Congo
210.4 t
in 2023
Panama
233.29 t
in 2023
Congo rank
143rd
Panama rank
141st

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Congo
  • Panama
100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 233.29 t against 210.4 t in Congo, a difference of 22.89 t.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 143rd and Panama ranks 141st of 201 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 141.84 t 202.17 t 60.33 t Panama
1970s 137.12 t 199.54 t 62.42 t Panama
1980s 137.12 t 283.06 t 145.94 t Panama
1990s 143.98 t 281.21 t 137.23 t Panama
2000s 173.59 t 320.27 t 146.68 t Panama
2010s 203.15 t 444.72 t 241.58 t Panama
2020s 211.77 t 311.53 t 99.76 t Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Congo or Panama?
Panama, at 233.29 t against 210.4 t in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Congo and Panama?
22.89 t, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Panama rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Congo ranks 143rd and Panama ranks 141st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).