Cook Islands vs Nauru: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cook Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0.1854 t against 0.1359 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.0495 t.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.4 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 194th and Nauru ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 5 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.04 t | 0.1089 t | 0.9331 t | Cook Islands |
| 1970s | 0.8824 t | 0.1226 t | 0.7598 t | Cook Islands |
| 1980s | 0.6572 t | 0.1299 t | 0.5273 t | Cook Islands |
| 1990s | 0.333 t | 0.1489 t | 0.1842 t | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 0.2206 t | 0.1796 t | 0.041 t | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 0.1375 t | 0.1886 t | 0.0511 t | Nauru |
| 2020s | 0.1359 t | 0.1847 t | 0.0489 t | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Cook Islands or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 0.1854 t against 0.1359 t in Cook Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 0.0495 t, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Nauru rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Cook Islands ranks 194th and Nauru ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).