Costa Rica vs Guyana: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Guyana
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 514.46 t against 496.07 t in Guyana, a difference of 18.39 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Guyana ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 6 and Guyana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 375.15 t | 338.63 t | 36.52 t | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 444.49 t | 361.2 t | 83.29 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 454.87 t | 332.44 t | 122.44 t | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 441.44 t | 349.46 t | 91.98 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 457.88 t | 417.97 t | 39.91 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 442.71 t | 505.8 t | 63.08 t | Guyana |
| 2020s | 598.78 t | 512.39 t | 86.39 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Guyana?
- Costa Rica, at 514.46 t against 496.07 t in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Guyana?
- 18.39 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Guyana rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Guyana ranks 135th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).