Costa Rica vs Mauritania: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Mauritania
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 514.46 t against 376.71 t in Mauritania, a difference of 137.75 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.4 times Mauritania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 375.15 t | 174.5 t | 200.65 t | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 444.49 t | 134.12 t | 310.36 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 454.87 t | 161.67 t | 293.2 t | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 441.44 t | 212.03 t | 229.41 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 457.88 t | 204.25 t | 253.63 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 442.71 t | 324.42 t | 118.29 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 598.78 t | 386.32 t | 212.46 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Mauritania?
- Costa Rica, at 514.46 t against 376.71 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Mauritania?
- 137.75 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Mauritania rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).