Croatia vs Guatemala: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Croatia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 2,298 t against 2,096 t in Croatia, a difference of 202 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.
Croatia ranks 97th and Guatemala ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,832 t | 1,532 t | 299.96 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 1,683 t | 1,699 t | 16.42 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 1,361 t | 2,204 t | 842.28 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 1,922 t | 2,290 t | 367.21 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 2,298 t against 2,096 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Guatemala?
- 202 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guatemala?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Guatemala rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Croatia ranks 97th and Guatemala ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).