Croatia vs Sierra Leone: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Croatia
2,096 t
in 2023
Sierra Leone
1,913 t
in 2023
Croatia rank
97th
Sierra Leone rank
100th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Croatia
  • Sierra Leone
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 2,096 t against 1,913 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 183 t.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 97th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 1,832 t 1,288 t 543.89 t Croatia
2000s 1,683 t 1,610 t 73.38 t Croatia
2010s 1,361 t 1,673 t 312.02 t Sierra Leone
2020s 1,922 t 1,960 t 37.3 t Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Sierra Leone?
Croatia, at 2,096 t against 1,913 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Sierra Leone?
183 t, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sierra Leone?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Sierra Leone rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Croatia ranks 97th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).