Cuba vs Ecuador: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Cuba
725.74 t
in 2023
Ecuador
794.69 t
in 2023
Cuba rank
124th
Ecuador rank
122nd

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cuba
  • Ecuador
5001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 794.69 t against 725.74 t in Cuba, a difference of 68.95 t.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Cuba ranks 124th and Ecuador ranks 122nd of 201 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 657.56 t 1,217 t 559.27 t Ecuador
1970s 660.62 t 997.24 t 336.62 t Ecuador
1980s 745.18 t 1,137 t 391.44 t Ecuador
1990s 841.4 t 1,627 t 786 t Ecuador
2000s 706.59 t 1,583 t 876.69 t Ecuador
2010s 766.82 t 897.49 t 130.67 t Ecuador
2020s 725.74 t 795.47 t 69.73 t Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 794.69 t against 725.74 t in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Ecuador?
68.95 t, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Ecuador rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Cuba ranks 124th and Ecuador ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).