Cuba vs Georgia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Cuba
725.74 t
in 2023
Georgia
827.75 t
in 2023
Cuba rank
124th
Georgia rank
121st

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cuba
  • Georgia
5007501.0k1.2k1.5k1.8k196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 827.75 t against 725.74 t in Cuba, a difference of 102.01 t.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Cuba ranks 124th and Georgia ranks 121st of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 847.38 t 1,244 t 396.63 t Georgia
2000s 706.59 t 1,241 t 534.15 t Georgia
2010s 766.82 t 736.38 t 30.44 t Cuba
2020s 725.74 t 794.77 t 69.03 t Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Georgia?
Georgia, at 827.75 t against 725.74 t in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Georgia?
102.01 t, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Cuba ranks 124th and Georgia ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).