Cuba vs New Zealand: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- New Zealand
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 725.74 t against 677.34 t in New Zealand, a difference of 48.4 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 124th and New Zealand ranks 126th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 657.56 t | 676.99 t | 19.43 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 660.62 t | 765.98 t | 105.36 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 745.18 t | 1,132 t | 386.97 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 841.4 t | 778.23 t | 63.17 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 706.59 t | 814.02 t | 107.43 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 766.82 t | 777.89 t | 11.07 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 725.74 t | 697.13 t | 28.61 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or New Zealand?
- Cuba, at 725.74 t against 677.34 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and New Zealand?
- 48.4 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 124th and New Zealand ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).