Cuba vs North Macedonia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Cuba
725.74 t
in 2023
North Macedonia
704.47 t
in 2023
Cuba rank
124th
North Macedonia rank
125th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cuba
  • North Macedonia
02505007501.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 725.74 t against 704.47 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 21.27 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Cuba ranks 124th and North Macedonia ranks 125th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 847.38 t 1,029 t 181.51 t North Macedonia
2000s 706.59 t 967.6 t 261.01 t North Macedonia
2010s 766.82 t 763.91 t 2.91 t Cuba
2020s 725.74 t 701.65 t 24.09 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or North Macedonia?
Cuba, at 725.74 t against 704.47 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and North Macedonia?
21.27 t, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Cuba and North Macedonia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Cuba ranks 124th and North Macedonia ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).