Cuba vs Switzerland: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Switzerland
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 725.74 t against 666.58 t in Switzerland, a difference of 59.16 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Cuba ranks 124th and Switzerland ranks 127th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 657.56 t | 1,008 t | 350.68 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 660.62 t | 843.89 t | 183.27 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 745.18 t | 865.69 t | 120.51 t | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 841.4 t | 843.82 t | 2.42 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 706.59 t | 736.32 t | 29.73 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 766.82 t | 699.6 t | 67.22 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 725.74 t | 700 t | 25.74 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Switzerland?
- Cuba, at 725.74 t against 666.58 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Switzerland?
- 59.16 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Switzerland rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 124th and Switzerland ranks 127th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).