Czechia vs Finland: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 6,137 t against 5,517 t in Finland, a difference of 620 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 57th and Finland ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,951 t | 4,811 t | 3,141 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 7,773 t | 5,895 t | 1,878 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 7,502 t | 5,245 t | 2,257 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 6,447 t | 5,638 t | 809.26 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Finland?
- Czechia, at 6,137 t against 5,517 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Finland?
- 620 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 57th and Finland ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).