Czechoslovakia vs Iraq: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Iraq
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 8,491 t against 8,088 t in Iraq, a difference of 403 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 38th and Iraq ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 3 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,002 t | 6,086 t | 5,916 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 10,002 t | 5,159 t | 4,843 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 8,767 t | 6,003 t | 2,764 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 8,335 t | 9,224 t | 889.41 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Iraq?
- Czechoslovakia, at 8,491 t against 8,088 t in Iraq as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Iraq?
- 403 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Iraq?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Iraq rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 38th and Iraq ranks 39th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).