Dominica vs Qatar: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Dominica
20.5 t
in 2023
Qatar
20.2 t
in 2023
Dominica rank
168th
Qatar rank
169th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Dominica
  • Qatar
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 20.5 t against 20.2 t in Qatar, a difference of 0.3 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.

Dominica ranks 168th and Qatar ranks 169th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 8.73 t 20.2 t 11.47 t Qatar
1970s 8.73 t 20.2 t 11.47 t Qatar
1980s 9.6 t 20.2 t 10.6 t Qatar
1990s 9.11 t 20.2 t 11.09 t Qatar
2000s 14.42 t 20.2 t 5.78 t Qatar
2010s 20.5 t 20.2 t 0.299 t Dominica
2020s 20.5 t 25.25 t 4.75 t Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or Qatar?
Dominica, at 20.5 t against 20.2 t in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and Qatar?
0.3 t, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Qatar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Qatar rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Dominica ranks 168th and Qatar ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).