Dominican Republic vs Libya: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominican Republic
- Libya
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 1,319 t against 1,222 t in Libya, a difference of 97 t.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 111th and Libya ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 428.43 t | 1,648 t | 1,219 t | Libya |
| 1970s | 493.36 t | 1,648 t | 1,155 t | Libya |
| 1980s | 569.55 t | 1,648 t | 1,078 t | Libya |
| 1990s | 577.8 t | 1,648 t | 1,070 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 787.87 t | 1,648 t | 860.02 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 854.56 t | 1,495 t | 640.61 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 1,194 t | 1,270 t | 75.79 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Dominican Republic or Libya?
- Dominican Republic, at 1,319 t against 1,222 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Dominican Republic and Libya?
- 97 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Libya rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominican Republic ranks 111th and Libya ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).