Eastern Africa vs Indonesia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eastern Africa
- Indonesia
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 64,898 t against 26,859 t in Indonesia, a difference of 38,039 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 2.4 times Indonesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Eastern Africa has been ahead every year.
Eastern Africa ranks 21st and Indonesia ranks 21st of 32 groups.
Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30,071 t | 18,036 t | 12,034 t | Eastern Africa |
| 1970s | 31,955 t | 18,891 t | 13,064 t | Eastern Africa |
| 1980s | 32,292 t | 21,236 t | 11,056 t | Eastern Africa |
| 1990s | 35,293 t | 23,349 t | 11,944 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2000s | 44,053 t | 24,108 t | 19,944 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2010s | 52,572 t | 25,642 t | 26,930 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 63,237 t | 25,417 t | 37,820 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Eastern Africa or Indonesia?
- Eastern Africa, at 64,898 t against 26,859 t in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Eastern Africa and Indonesia?
- 38,039 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Indonesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Indonesia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Eastern Africa ranks 21st and Indonesia ranks 21st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).