Eritrea vs Kuwait: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Eritrea
155.57 t
in 2023
Kuwait
121.2 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
151st
Kuwait rank
154th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Eritrea
  • Kuwait
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 155.57 t against 121.2 t in Kuwait, a difference of 34.37 t.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Kuwait's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 151st and Kuwait ranks 154th of 201 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Kuwait Difference Ahead
1990s 146.74 t 39.47 t 107.27 t Eritrea
2000s 129.61 t 53.23 t 76.38 t Eritrea
2010s 157.25 t 92.44 t 64.81 t Eritrea
2020s 154.97 t 117.52 t 37.45 t Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Kuwait?
Eritrea, at 155.57 t against 121.2 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Kuwait?
34.37 t, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kuwait?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Kuwait rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Eritrea ranks 151st and Kuwait ranks 154th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).