Eritrea vs Namibia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eritrea
- Namibia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 155.57 t against 151.99 t in Namibia, a difference of 3.58 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Namibia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 151st and Namibia ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 146.74 t | 175.76 t | 29.02 t | Namibia |
| 2000s | 129.61 t | 166.25 t | 36.64 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 157.25 t | 209.27 t | 52.02 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 154.97 t | 260.34 t | 105.37 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Namibia?
- Eritrea, at 155.57 t against 151.99 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Namibia?
- 3.58 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Eritrea ranks 151st and Namibia ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).