Eritrea vs Suriname: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eritrea
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 157.03 t against 155.57 t in Eritrea, a difference of 1.46 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Suriname ahead.
Eritrea ranks 151st and Suriname ranks 150th of 201 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 146.74 t | 151.05 t | 4.31 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 129.61 t | 139.32 t | 9.71 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 157.25 t | 159.37 t | 2.13 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 154.97 t | 163.25 t | 8.28 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 157.03 t against 155.57 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Suriname?
- 1.46 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Suriname?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Suriname rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Eritrea ranks 151st and Suriname ranks 150th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).