Estonia vs Saudi Arabia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1,791 t against 1,736 t in Estonia, a difference of 55 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Estonia ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 90th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,848 t | 2,235 t | 387.04 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 1,523 t | 2,175 t | 652.89 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 1,556 t | 1,348 t | 207.59 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 1,797 t | 1,662 t | 134.9 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1,791 t against 1,736 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 55 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 90th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).