Eswatini vs Mauritius: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 86.27 t against 77.76 t in Eswatini, a difference of 8.51 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 159th and Mauritius ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43.41 t | 3.34 t | 40.07 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 39.47 t | 4.92 t | 34.55 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 58.8 t | 18.14 t | 40.67 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 65.43 t | 25.94 t | 39.49 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 33.85 t | 50.84 t | 16.99 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 70.31 t | 81.03 t | 10.72 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 80.84 t | 91.32 t | 10.48 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 86.27 t against 77.76 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 8.51 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 159th and Mauritius ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).