Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 80.8 t against 77.76 t in Eswatini, a difference of 3.04 t.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 147th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 145th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43.41 t | 15.71 t | 27.7 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 39.47 t | 24.24 t | 15.23 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 58.8 t | 28.28 t | 30.52 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 65.43 t | 30.3 t | 35.13 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 33.85 t | 56.56 t | 22.71 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 70.31 t | 44.44 t | 25.87 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 80.84 t | 75.75 t | 5.09 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 80.8 t against 77.76 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 3.04 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 147th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 145th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).