Ethiopia PDR vs Peru: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Peru
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 5,018 t against 5,012 t in Peru, a difference of 6 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 64th and Peru ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,434 t | 2,823 t | 3,611 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 5,828 t | 2,758 t | 3,070 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 5,708 t | 2,904 t | 2,804 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 5,298 t | 2,773 t | 2,526 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Peru?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 5,018 t against 5,012 t in Peru as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Peru?
- 6 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 64th and Peru ranks 65th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).