Finland vs Nepal: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Finland
5,517 t
in 2023
Nepal
5,156 t
in 2023
Finland rank
59th
Nepal rank
61st

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Finland
  • Nepal
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 5,517 t against 5,156 t in Nepal, a difference of 361 t.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 61st of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 5,910 t 2,181 t 3,728 t Finland
1970s 5,897 t 2,629 t 3,267 t Finland
1980s 5,606 t 3,490 t 2,116 t Finland
1990s 4,819 t 4,198 t 621.25 t Finland
2000s 5,895 t 4,749 t 1,146 t Finland
2010s 5,245 t 5,285 t 39.62 t Nepal
2020s 5,638 t 5,250 t 387.99 t Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Finland or Nepal?
Finland, at 5,517 t against 5,156 t in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Finland and Nepal?
361 t, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Nepal rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Finland ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).