Guadeloupe vs Malta: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guadeloupe
- Malta
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 0.0805 t against 0 t in Malta, a difference of 0.0805 t.
Across all 46 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Guadeloupe ranks 195th and Malta ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3506 t | 9.42 t | 9.07 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 0.7843 t | 8.21 t | 7.42 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.5405 t | 6.56 t | 6.02 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.2806 t | 4.92 t | 4.64 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.1315 t | 3.52 t | 3.38 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Guadeloupe or Malta?
- Guadeloupe, at 0.0805 t against 0 t in Malta as of 2006.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Guadeloupe and Malta?
- 0.0805 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Malta?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do Guadeloupe and Malta rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Guadeloupe ranks 195th and Malta ranks 198th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).