Guatemala vs Tajikistan: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 2,333 t against 2,298 t in Guatemala, a difference of 35 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 95th and Tajikistan ranks 93rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,532 t | 1,332 t | 200.1 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 1,699 t | 1,456 t | 243.4 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 2,204 t | 1,895 t | 308.35 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 2,290 t | 2,442 t | 152.52 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 2,333 t against 2,298 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Tajikistan?
- 35 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Tajikistan rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 95th and Tajikistan ranks 93rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).