Guatemala vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Guatemala
2,298 t
in 2023
Uruguay
2,367 t
in 2023
Guatemala rank
95th
Uruguay rank
92nd

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Guatemala
  • Uruguay
2.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 2,367 t against 2,298 t in Guatemala, a difference of 69 t.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Guatemala ranks 95th and Uruguay ranks 92nd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 1,520 t 1,844 t 324.09 t Uruguay
1970s 1,580 t 1,619 t 38.74 t Uruguay
1980s 1,635 t 1,356 t 278.79 t Guatemala
1990s 1,561 t 1,324 t 237.09 t Guatemala
2000s 1,699 t 2,610 t 910.94 t Uruguay
2010s 2,204 t 5,395 t 3,192 t Uruguay
2020s 2,290 t 3,805 t 1,515 t Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 2,367 t against 2,298 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Uruguay?
69 t, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Guatemala ranks 95th and Uruguay ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).