Japan vs Latvia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 4,003 t against 3,519 t in Japan, a difference of 484 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 79th and Latvia ranks 77th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,097 t | 3,251 t | 846.59 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 3,694 t | 2,776 t | 918.4 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 3,519 t | 3,734 t | 215.05 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 3,519 t | 4,145 t | 625.73 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 4,003 t against 3,519 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Latvia?
- 484 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Japan ranks 79th and Latvia ranks 77th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).