Japan vs Zambia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Japan
- Zambia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 3,519 t against 3,432 t in Zambia, a difference of 87 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 80th of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,040 t | 1,606 t | 5,434 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 5,570 t | 1,716 t | 3,855 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 6,376 t | 1,594 t | 4,781 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 4,260 t | 1,830 t | 2,430 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 3,694 t | 2,091 t | 1,603 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 3,519 t | 2,667 t | 852.15 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 3,519 t | 3,121 t | 398.07 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Zambia?
- Japan, at 3,519 t against 3,432 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Zambia?
- 87 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Zambia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Japan ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 80th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).