Jordan vs Switzerland: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jordan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 666.58 t against 666.56 t in Jordan, a difference of 0.02 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Jordan ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 115th of 186 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 668.8 t | 1,008 t | 339.44 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 531.19 t | 843.89 t | 312.71 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 345.47 t | 865.69 t | 520.22 t | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 444.62 t | 843.82 t | 399.2 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 465.61 t | 736.32 t | 270.72 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 544.5 t | 699.6 t | 155.1 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 549.48 t | 700 t | 150.53 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 666.58 t against 666.56 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and Switzerland?
- 0.02 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Switzerland rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Jordan ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 115th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).