Kiribati vs Singapore: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Kiribati
0 t
in 2023
Singapore
0.0092 t
in 2023
Kiribati rank
198th
Singapore rank
197th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Kiribati
  • Singapore
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0092 t against 0 t in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0092 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Kiribati ranks 198th and Singapore ranks 197th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 1.17 t 1.17 t Singapore
1970s 0.392 t 1.11 t 0.7146 t Singapore
1980s 4.37 t 0.4896 t 3.88 t Kiribati
1990s 7.22 t 0.0246 t 7.2 t Kiribati
2000s 9.41 t 0.0102 t 9.4 t Kiribati
2010s 0 t 0.0098 t 0.0098 t Singapore
2020s 0 t 0.0092 t 0.0092 t Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Kiribati or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0092 t against 0 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Kiribati and Singapore?
0.0092 t, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Singapore rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Kiribati ranks 198th and Singapore ranks 197th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).