Nauru vs Tuvalu: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Nauru
0.1854 t
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.169 t
in 2023
Nauru rank
192nd
Tuvalu rank
193rd

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Nauru
  • Tuvalu
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.1854 t against 0.169 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0164 t.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Nauru ranks 192nd and Tuvalu ranks 193rd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1089 t 0.2784 t 0.1696 t Tuvalu
1970s 0.1226 t 0.1966 t 0.074 t Tuvalu
1980s 0.1299 t 0.2049 t 0.075 t Tuvalu
1990s 0.1489 t 0.1395 t 0.0093 t Nauru
2000s 0.1796 t 0.1278 t 0.0518 t Nauru
2010s 0.1886 t 0.1306 t 0.058 t Nauru
2020s 0.1847 t 0.1806 t 0.0041 t Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Nauru or Tuvalu?
Nauru, at 0.1854 t against 0.169 t in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Nauru and Tuvalu?
0.0164 t, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Tuvalu rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Nauru ranks 192nd and Tuvalu ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).