Nicaragua vs Saudi Arabia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Nicaragua
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 2,009 t against 1,791 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 218 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 99th and Saudi Arabia ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,823 t | 348.38 t | 1,474 t | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | 1,888 t | 323.22 t | 1,565 t | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 1,834 t | 1,771 t | 62.1 t | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 1,919 t | 2,459 t | 539.91 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 2,193 t | 2,175 t | 17.44 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 2,214 t | 1,348 t | 866 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 2,038 t | 1,662 t | 375.83 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Nicaragua or Saudi Arabia?
- Nicaragua, at 2,009 t against 1,791 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Nicaragua and Saudi Arabia?
- 218 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Saudi Arabia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Nicaragua ranks 99th and Saudi Arabia ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).