Philippines vs Yugoslav SFR: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Philippines
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 12,421 t against 10,939 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 1,482 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Philippines ranks 36th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 39th of 201 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,244 t | 17,288 t | 8,044 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 11,840 t | 16,047 t | 4,207 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 10,626 t | 14,488 t | 3,862 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 11,351 t | 12,490 t | 1,139 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Philippines or Yugoslav SFR?
- Philippines, at 12,421 t against 10,939 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Philippines and Yugoslav SFR?
- 1,482 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Philippines and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Philippines ranks 36th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 39th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).