Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1,791 t against 1,743 t in Rwanda, a difference of 48 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 102nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 4 and Saudi Arabia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 654.05 t | 348.38 t | 305.67 t | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 777.43 t | 323.22 t | 454.21 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 930.69 t | 1,771 t | 840.78 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 813.28 t | 2,459 t | 1,646 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 1,323 t | 2,175 t | 852.52 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 1,586 t | 1,348 t | 237.55 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 1,746 t | 1,662 t | 83.43 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Rwanda or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1,791 t against 1,743 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
- 48 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Saudi Arabia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Rwanda ranks 102nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).