Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Serbia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 4,977 t against 4,897 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 80 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Serbia ranks 66th and Turkmenistan ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,501 t | 5,370 t | 1,869 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 4,621 t | 4,612 t | 9.17 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 4,710 t | 4,568 t | 142.24 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Serbia or Turkmenistan?
- Serbia, at 4,977 t against 4,897 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 80 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Turkmenistan rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Serbia ranks 66th and Turkmenistan ranks 67th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).