Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sierra Leone
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2,085 t against 1,913 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 172 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,221 t | 1,599 t | 377.66 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 1,288 t | 2,000 t | 711.23 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 1,316 t | 2,275 t | 958.83 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 1,297 t | 2,434 t | 1,137 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1,610 t | 2,547 t | 937.34 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1,673 t | 1,807 t | 133.28 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,960 t | 2,005 t | 45.52 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Sierra Leone or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2,085 t against 1,913 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
- 172 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Sierra Leone ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).