Bangladesh vs Lithuania: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Bangladesh
- Lithuania
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.7539 kg/ha against 0.6236 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.1303 kg/ha.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 6th of 201 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6603 kg/ha | 0.5721 kg/ha | 0.0882 kg/ha | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0.684 kg/ha | 0.6769 kg/ha | 0.0072 kg/ha | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.7103 kg/ha | 0.6274 kg/ha | 0.0829 kg/ha | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.7368 kg/ha | 0.5839 kg/ha | 0.1529 kg/ha | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Bangladesh or Lithuania?
- Bangladesh, at 0.7539 kg/ha against 0.6236 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Bangladesh and Lithuania?
- 0.1303 kg/ha, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Lithuania rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Bangladesh ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 6th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).