Bhutan vs Eritrea: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Eritrea
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.0463 kg/ha against 0.0432 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0031 kg/ha.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 154th and Eritrea ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0543 kg/ha | 0.0646 kg/ha | 0.0103 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0576 kg/ha | 0.0407 kg/ha | 0.0169 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.0836 kg/ha | 0.0435 kg/ha | 0.0401 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.0506 kg/ha | 0.043 kg/ha | 0.0076 kg/ha | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Bhutan or Eritrea?
- Bhutan, at 0.0463 kg/ha against 0.0432 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Bhutan and Eritrea?
- 0.0031 kg/ha, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Eritrea rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 154th and Eritrea ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).