Botswana vs Peru: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Peru
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.1507 kg/ha against 0.1453 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.0054 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Botswana ranks 99th and Peru ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0388 kg/ha | 0.2468 kg/ha | 0.208 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 0.0414 kg/ha | 0.1687 kg/ha | 0.1274 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1980s | 0.0499 kg/ha | 0.1371 kg/ha | 0.0872 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.0634 kg/ha | 0.1323 kg/ha | 0.0689 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.0531 kg/ha | 0.1845 kg/ha | 0.1314 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.0664 kg/ha | 0.1658 kg/ha | 0.0994 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.2214 kg/ha | 0.1498 kg/ha | 0.0716 kg/ha | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Botswana or Peru?
- Botswana, at 0.1507 kg/ha against 0.1453 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Botswana and Peru?
- 0.0054 kg/ha, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 99th and Peru ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).