Brazil vs Serbia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Brazil
0.3158 kg/ha
in 2023
Serbia
0.3264 kg/ha
in 2023
Brazil rank
54th
Serbia rank
52nd

Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Brazil
  • Serbia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.3264 kg/ha against 0.3158 kg/ha in Brazil, a difference of 0.0106 kg/ha.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 201 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1648 kg/ha 0.2294 kg/ha 0.0646 kg/ha Serbia
2010s 0.2161 kg/ha 0.2988 kg/ha 0.0827 kg/ha Serbia
2020s 0.2838 kg/ha 0.3085 kg/ha 0.0248 kg/ha Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Brazil or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.3264 kg/ha against 0.3158 kg/ha in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Brazil and Serbia?
0.0106 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Brazil ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).