Canada vs Malawi: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Canada
- Malawi
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0.26 kg/ha against 0.2558 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.0042 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Canada ranks 70th and Malawi ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1839 kg/ha | 0.3123 kg/ha | 0.1284 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 1970s | 0.171 kg/ha | 0.2787 kg/ha | 0.1077 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 1980s | 0.1973 kg/ha | 0.2719 kg/ha | 0.0746 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 1990s | 0.2097 kg/ha | 0.2599 kg/ha | 0.0502 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.2501 kg/ha | 0.2525 kg/ha | 0.0024 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.2527 kg/ha | 0.2521 kg/ha | 0.0006 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2020s | 0.2646 kg/ha | 0.2547 kg/ha | 0.0099 kg/ha | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Canada or Malawi?
- Canada, at 0.26 kg/ha against 0.2558 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Canada and Malawi?
- 0.0042 kg/ha, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Malawi rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Canada ranks 70th and Malawi ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).