Central Asia vs Lithuania: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Central Asia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.6236 kg/ha against 0.3424 kg/ha in Central Asia, a difference of 0.2812 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.8 times Central Asia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 8th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 32 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3182 kg/ha | 0.5721 kg/ha | 0.2539 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.3365 kg/ha | 0.6769 kg/ha | 0.3404 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.3772 kg/ha | 0.6274 kg/ha | 0.2502 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.337 kg/ha | 0.5839 kg/ha | 0.247 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Central Asia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.6236 kg/ha against 0.3424 kg/ha in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Central Asia and Lithuania?
- 0.2812 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Lithuania rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Central Asia ranks 8th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).