Chile vs Japan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Chile
- Japan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0921 kg/ha against 0.092 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.0001 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Chile ranks 120th and Japan ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1822 kg/ha | 0.185 kg/ha | 0.0028 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 0.1593 kg/ha | 0.1236 kg/ha | 0.0357 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.1567 kg/ha | 0.1352 kg/ha | 0.0215 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1990s | 0.1781 kg/ha | 0.1068 kg/ha | 0.0713 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.2031 kg/ha | 0.0935 kg/ha | 0.1096 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.1488 kg/ha | 0.0879 kg/ha | 0.0609 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.1035 kg/ha | 0.0912 kg/ha | 0.0123 kg/ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Chile or Japan?
- Chile, at 0.0921 kg/ha against 0.092 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Chile and Japan?
- 0.0001 kg/ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Japan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Chile ranks 120th and Japan ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).