Côte d'Ivoire vs Uzbekistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.4669 kg/ha against 0.1637 kg/ha in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.3032 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.9 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 29 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1953 kg/ha | 0.3813 kg/ha | 0.186 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.2146 kg/ha | 0.3677 kg/ha | 0.1531 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.1869 kg/ha | 0.5931 kg/ha | 0.4062 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.1707 kg/ha | 0.482 kg/ha | 0.3113 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Côte d'Ivoire or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.4669 kg/ha against 0.1637 kg/ha in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan?
- 0.3032 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).