Cuba vs Fiji: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0.0379 kg/ha against 0.0326 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.0053 kg/ha.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 163rd and Fiji ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0567 kg/ha | 0.0344 kg/ha | 0.0223 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.0344 kg/ha | 0.0334 kg/ha | 0.0011 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.0314 kg/ha | 0.0266 kg/ha | 0.0048 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.0317 kg/ha | 0.0163 kg/ha | 0.0154 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0296 kg/ha | 0.0153 kg/ha | 0.0143 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0356 kg/ha | 0.0313 kg/ha | 0.0043 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0326 kg/ha | 0.0431 kg/ha | 0.0105 kg/ha | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cuba or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 0.0379 kg/ha against 0.0326 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cuba and Fiji?
- 0.0053 kg/ha, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Fiji?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Fiji rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 163rd and Fiji ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).