Czechia vs Eastern Africa: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Eastern Africa
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.1344 kg/ha in Eastern Africa, a difference of 0.3253 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 3.4 times Eastern Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 22nd and Eastern Africa ranks 26th of 185 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Eastern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4593 kg/ha | 0.1131 kg/ha | 0.3462 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.5174 kg/ha | 0.1207 kg/ha | 0.3967 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5585 kg/ha | 0.1174 kg/ha | 0.4411 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.4867 kg/ha | 0.132 kg/ha | 0.3547 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Eastern Africa?
- Czechia, at 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.1344 kg/ha in Eastern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Eastern Africa?
- 0.3253 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Eastern Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Eastern Africa rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 22nd and Eastern Africa ranks 26th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).