Czechia vs Estonia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.4612 kg/ha against 0.4597 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.0015 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Czechia ranks 26th and Estonia ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4593 kg/ha | 0.4182 kg/ha | 0.0411 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.5174 kg/ha | 0.481 kg/ha | 0.0365 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5585 kg/ha | 0.4445 kg/ha | 0.114 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.4867 kg/ha | 0.4817 kg/ha | 0.005 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0.4612 kg/ha against 0.4597 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Estonia?
- 0.0015 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Estonia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Estonia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 26th and Estonia ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).