Czechia vs Finland: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.4557 kg/ha in Finland, a difference of 0.004 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Finland ahead.
Czechia ranks 26th and Finland ranks 27th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4593 kg/ha | 0.4144 kg/ha | 0.0449 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.5174 kg/ha | 0.4903 kg/ha | 0.0271 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5585 kg/ha | 0.4341 kg/ha | 0.1245 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.4867 kg/ha | 0.4648 kg/ha | 0.0219 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Finland?
- Czechia, at 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.4557 kg/ha in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Finland?
- 0.004 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 26th and Finland ranks 27th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).